Hwang Kwang-Kuo has structure mandala model of self and theoretical model of Face and Favor to re-interpret the thoughts and idea of Confucianism. However, since these two models have originated from the understanding of mankind for self-universality, it is why it has only interpret Chinese culture from the perspective the ethics for ordinary people, and yet without realizing that Zhou culture had, during its process of shaping, such two different kinds of course debates for governance strategies of country as "honoring the wise -- prime credit of acknowledge" and "showing piety to kin -- prime favor" for long period of time. In fact, the community under the influence of Chinese culture has always been led by intellectuals, therefore, no matter what kind of measures are employed among civic customs the authentic advocate for Confucianism in later ages has, in most of the time, re-oriented "showing piety to kin -- prime favor" through education as in addition with the "principle of honoring the wise -- prime credit of acknowledgement" so that the two courses can be are inebriated with and subordinated to the endowment of the "principle of showing respect to the ranking." Ultimately, the relationalism of morality dominating is developed. Then, comprehensive aspects and facades are basically of the ethics for scholarly people developed from Confucian relationalism, focusing on four respective quadrants as "Heaven, Crowd, Object, Self," thus bringing forth such each and every compatible relationship. Besides, Hwang Kwang-Kuo has conceived wrongly with his understanding towards the order on effort made in "The Analects of Confucius" as he did not render specific appreciation in pertaining to "halt, fixation, silence, tranquility, anxiety and obtainment." Most of all, he has, in particular, wrongly interpreted the moral code and justification from "The Analects of Confucius" and "The Doctrine of Mean," yet without accurately rendering the texture of the written texts. As such, the self-cultivation theory of Confucianism as structured sparks off various kinds of substantive problems. This article would, aside from making criticism these substantive problems, also make out its own perspective. As a matter of fact, ethics of intellectual is, including plebeians, of such idea of cultivation that both classes should follow, while the destination of the concept is "sanctification." Since the arguments of cultural tradition on "the Self " is found within Chinese culture for a long period of time, it is only with the substantive measure as the academic language as used to interpret "Sanctification" so that it can break lose the barrier between the "micro world" and "life world" it can center on the specific nousism and kungfuism particular of Chinese culture (especially of Confucian thoughts) before there can be Confucian psychology of cultivation, rendering benefits to the localization task of social science. £¨Key words: Chinese Culture, the Ethics for Scholarly People, the relationalism of morality dominating, the Self, the Ego, Psychology of Cultivation£©
Õ“ÎÄÏÂÝd
